| --- |
| license: apache-2.0 |
| language: |
| - en |
| tags: |
| - rag |
| - long-context |
| - llm-search |
| - reasoning |
| - factuality |
| - retrieval |
| - question-answering |
| - iterative-search |
| task_categories: |
| - text-classification |
| - token-classification |
| - table-question-answering |
| - question-answering |
| pretty_name: Who are I or you |
| size_categories: |
| - n>1T |
| --- |
| |
| # FRAMES: Factuality, Retrieval, And reasoning MEasurement Set |
|
|
| FRAMES is a comprehensive evaluation dataset designed to test the capabilities of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems across factuality, retrieval accuracy, and reasoning. |
| Our paper with details and experiments is available on arXiv: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12941](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12941). |
|
|
|
|
| ## Dataset Overview |
|
|
| - 824 challenging multi-hop questions requiring information from 2-15 Wikipedia articles |
| - Questions span diverse topics including history, sports, science, animals, health, etc. |
| - Each question is labeled with reasoning types: numerical, tabular, multiple constraints, temporal, and post-processing |
| - Gold answers and relevant Wikipedia articles provided for each question |
|
|
| ## Key Features |
|
|
| - Tests end-to-end RAG capabilities in a unified framework |
| - Requires integration of information from multiple sources |
| - Incorporates complex reasoning and temporal disambiguation |
| - Designed to be challenging for state-of-the-art language models |
|
|
| ## Usage |
|
|
| This dataset can be used to: |
| - Evaluate RAG system performance |
| - Benchmark language model factuality and reasoning |
| - Develop and test multi-hop retrieval strategies |
|
|
| ## Baseline Results |
|
|
| We provide baseline results using state-of-the-art models like Gemini-Pro-1.5-0514: |
|
|
| - Naive prompting: 40.8% accuracy |
| - BM25 retrieval (4 docs): 47.4% accuracy |
| - Oracle retrieval: 72.9% accuracy |
| - Multi-step retrieval & reasoning: 66% accuracy |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| If you use this dataset in your research, please cite our paper: |
|
|
| ``` |
| @misc{krishna2024factfetchreasonunified, |
| title={Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation}, |
| author={Satyapriya Krishna and Kalpesh Krishna and Anhad Mohananey and Steven Schwarcz and Adam Stambler and Shyam Upadhyay and Manaal Faruqui}, |
| year={2024}, |
| eprint={2409.12941}, |
| archivePrefix={arXiv}, |
| primaryClass={cs.CL}, |
| url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12941}, |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| We hope FRAMES will be useful for advancing RAG systems and language model capabilities. For more details, please refer to our full paper. |
